ZEST insights

In essence, a brand manager’s job is devoted to educating doctors about the merits of their product in the hope the doctor will decide to start routinely prescribing it. Vast amounts of money are spent trying to achieve this. So a brand manager could be forgiven for thinking the task is done once a doctor starts using the product. But as we shall see, this is just clearing the first hurdle…

 

We talk to a lot of doctors. Whether GPs or specialists, these educated people all share a genuine desire to achieve the best health outcome they can for their patients. And the other thing they all share is a belief that all their patients are compliant. Every single one of them!

 

Call me a sceptic, but I am doubtful that even the most diligent of doctors with endless time to spend with their patients achieves total compliance across his or her entire patient population, with their various socioeconomic backgrounds, differing belief systems and range of forgetfulness. The BMJ thinks this is doubtful too.¹

 

Why does this matter? It matters because if a doctor doesn’t think that non-compliance is an issue for their patients, when a drug they prescribe fails to have the desired effect they will respond by changing the dose or even the medication.

 

This results in the doctor having a false understanding of the benefits of the drug and a sub-optimal health outcome for the patient, with the possibility of an increased financial cost to the health system and the patient. It also unjustly erodes trust in the pharmaceutical representatives who have invested so much time in educating the doctor about the product.

 

And the reality? Research has indicated that half of the medications prescribed for people with chronic conditions are not taken.² The BMJ believes this gap between perception and reality is likely to be due to a “difficulty for health professionals in acknowledging that it is the patients’ agendas and not their own that determine whether patients take their medicines.”¹

 

In other words, the doctors are making the effort to educate patients about the importance of compliance and assuming because they have done so it must be happening – but they’re not taking into account the patient’s views of health and care and if necessary readjusting the goal of treatment (or as we’d say in Med Ed-land, they’re not incorporating adult-learning principles into their consults).

 

The World Health Organization believes that the language used could be the start of the problem.³ The word “compliance” means the patient is doing as he or she is told by the doctor; that the patient is subordinate in the relationship. To tackle this imbalance a WHO report recommends adopting the term “adherence” rather than “compliance”. It suggests this is a less judgmental term and just indicates whether or not the patient’s behaviour is in agreement with recommendations from the healthcare provider, without the hierarchical connotation.

 

But really, is this anything more than sugar-coated compliance? It doesn’t require any change in the doctor’s approach to managing their patient. So compliance is the same and the brand manager’s return on investment is diminished.

 

But it’s not all doom and gloom. In the next post we’ll discuss the “concordant” model, the paradigm shift it represents in healthcare provider–patient relationships, and why brand managers should know about it.

 

1. Marinker M, Shaw J. Not to be taken as directed. BMJ 2003;326:348–9.
2. Haynes RB, McKibbon A, Kanani R. Systemic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet 1996;348:383–6.
3. World Health Orgnisation. Adherence to Long Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. 2003.

This entry was posted on Monday, September 17th, 2007 at 8:31 am by Stuart Baker and is filed in the category Update. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.